Home Blog Page 4

Kodak Charmera Review: It’s Crap, But That’s the Charm

0

A world of AI. Constant connection to the world around us. Work from an office, work from home, work while you commute. Always on. Always plugged in. Always posting.

Life, today, is a futuristic nightmare. I’ve played my part in that, don’t get me wrong. But that intro gave me an ick that only tech can do. Tech seems to ruin everything, which is why I love a simple gadget. Enter the Kodak Charmera.

What is the point of the Kodak Charmera?

Kodak hasn’t tried to make up for the fumbling of the digital camera with the Charmera. Instead, it’s trying to tap into a modern day ditching of high-tech. It’s not uncommon to see retro cameras being drawn upon, or even disposable cameras for people on a trip. Film and printing photos has a certain draw to it in a world of digital media.

Doom Slice, second only to Difontaines in my opinion…

The Charmera skirts the line here, creating digital media that looks retro. The Charmera boasts a whopping 1.6MP lens that frankly takes woeful photos. Low-light, a slight shake or a centimetre in the wrong direction, and you’ve taken a terrible photo. What’s worst is you won’t know it’s a bad photo till you get home.

Or is that really worse?

This is actually the point of the Charmera. Instead of you getting bogged down in taking 10 photos of the moment and it looking perfect, now you take one photo of the moment and get back to it.

This is good tech.

Watch My Kodak Charmera Review

@goosed_ie

I bought this after seeing @Franco in Éire 🇮🇪🇵🇭 unbox his. The camera is a little crap. But that’s the charm in the #Charmera from #Kodak . It’s cute and you gotta keep the photo review till later.

♬ original sound – Marty | Goosed.ie

Living with the Charmera’s Limitations

The keychain form factor means it’s genuinely always with you, which matters more than the spec sheet suggests. I’ve had proper cameras stay home because I couldn’t be bothered carrying them. The Charmera clips to your keys and disappears until you need it.

That 1.6MP sensor isn’t a compromise, it’s a feature. The technical limitations force a different approach. You can’t pixel-peep. You can’t zoom in and check focus. You compose, shoot, and trust the process. It’s oddly freeing once you accept it.

The lack of a screen changes your behaviour entirely. Without immediate feedback, you stop chimping. You stop taking insurance shots. You stop trying to manufacture perfection and just capture what’s in front of you. Some will hate this. I’ve found it genuinely refreshing.

When It Works (and When It Doesn’t)

The Charmera takes some bad photos, but every now and then, it captures the essence of a moment, and that’s amazing. Decent light and reasonable subject distance, and you’ll get something with character. The grain, the slight softness, the imperfect exposure, it all adds to photos that feel authentic rather than processed.

But be realistic about its limits. Don’t expect sharp landscapes or detailed portraits. This isn’t replacing your phone camera for important documentation or anything requiring clarity. It’s for spontaneous moments where the act of capturing matters more than technical excellence.

The Verdict

The Charmera won’t suit everyone. If you need reliable image quality or want control over your photography, look elsewhere. But if you’re tired of the modern photography loop, shoot, review, delete, repeat, this offers a genuine alternative.

It’s a deliberate step backwards that somehow feels like progress. You stay present. You engage with moments rather than screens. You accept imperfection as part of the process.

In a world drowning in megapixels and computational photography, the Charmera’s limitations are its greatest strength. It’s not trying to compete with your phone. It’s trying to make photography fun again.

And mostly, it succeeds.

Audi Revolut F1 Team to Open New Chapter in Motorsport

0

The Kraftwerk power station in Berlin isn’t an obvious venue for a Formula 1 launch. That’s precisely why Audi chose it. Yesterday’s event, which transforms into a public experience today for ballot winners, marks the German manufacturer’s entry into F1 after years of speculation and preparation. What’s striking isn’t just that they’ve finally committed, but how they’ve structured the entire operation.

The Works Team Advantage

I’ve followed F1 long enough to know that works teams, those controlling both engine and chassis development, have a fundamental advantage. McLaren’s resurgence with Mercedes power units has been impressive, but they’re still dependent on another manufacturer’s development priorities. Audi faces no such constraint.

Their setup spans three facilities: power unit development in Neuburg, Germany; chassis engineering and race operations in Hinwil, Switzerland; and the Technology Centre in Bicester, giving them access to what’s essentially F1’s Silicon Valley. Mattia Binotto’s point about “controlling every variable from the engine block to the front wing” isn’t marketing waffle. It’s the structural reality that allowed Mercedes to dominate the hybrid era and Red Bull to extract performance others couldn’t match.

The timing aligns with 2026 regulations emphasising electrification, pushing hybrid systems to nearly 50% electric power and mandating sustainable fuels. For a manufacturer investing heavily in electric vehicle technology, F1 suddenly becomes relevant again as a development platform, not just a marketing exercise.

Revolut’s Integration

Title sponsorships usually mean prominent branding and corporate hospitality. The Revolut partnership appears more substantive. Beyond the logos on the R26’s titanium and carbon fibre livery, they’re handling the team’s financial operations infrastructure.

For a team operating across three countries with different currencies, payment systems, and banking regulations, this isn’t trivial. Cross-border transactions, multi-currency accounts, and real-time financial management actually matter when you’re coordinating thousands of component deliveries, travel logistics, and contractor payments across Europe.

I use Revolut for exactly this reason when travelling. South Korea, Japan, New York, you name it – my Revolut card has worked. The ability to hold multiple currencies, make instant transfers, and avoid conversion fees scales from personal use to complex operations. Whether it provides competitive advantage is debatable, but it certainly removes friction from an already complicated structure, at least on a personal level!

Realistic Timeline Expectations

Here’s what I appreciate: Audi’s stated goal is championship contention by 2030. Not podiums in year two, not victories by 2028. Four years to become genuinely competitive. If they mimic Revolut’s dominance in Ireland they’ll do well, the digital bank now with 3 million customers here.

That’s honest about F1’s reality. Mercedes entered as a works team in 2010 and didn’t win a championship until 2014. Red Bull bought Jaguar in 2004 and won their first title in 2010. Even with substantial resources, building the technical capability, operational processes, and team culture that delivers championships takes years.

Toyota is the cautionary tale. They spent hundreds of millions, employed talented people, built impressive facilities, and never won a race. F1 punishes inefficiency ruthlessly. The margins between midfield competitiveness and championship contention are measured in thousandths of seconds extracted from thousands of components.

The Driver Question

Nico Hulkenberg brings experience but and until last year carried the distinction of being F1’s most experienced driver without a podium finish. That changed when he achieved his first and only Formula 1 podium in 2025 at the British Grand Prix at Silverstone, showing he’s professional, consistent, and will provide valuable feedback during development, and keeps going until something gets delivered.

Gabriel Bortoleto represents the complete gamble. Jumping into F1 with a new team means learning two massive challenges simultaneously: the series itself and how to work with an organisation still finding its identity. If the car is competitive, he could establish himself. If it struggles, he might not get a second chance. Fans of Drive to Survive are licking their lips already.

What Actually Matters Now

The Kraftwerk spectacle, the adidas clothing range, the custom Revolut cards for guests, all create atmosphere. What determines success happens in wind tunnels, on test rigs, and during countless simulation hours across those three facilities.

We’ll see the R26 run properly at Bahrain testing in February, then the season opener in Melbourne. Early performance will establish baselines, but genuine competitive level only reveals itself over a full season as teams develop their packages and operational efficiency.

The 2026 regulation changes level the field somewhat. Everyone starts with new technical parameters, new constraints, new opportunities. Mercedes won’t have a four-year hybrid development head start this time. That’s Audi’s window.

The Broader Picture

I’m genuinely interested to see how this develops, partly because the structural foundation appears sound. Works team, experienced leadership in Binotto and Jonathan Wheatley, realistic timelines, and regulations that align with manufacturer priorities.

But F1 has broken plenty of ambitious projects. The difference between well-funded effort and competitive success isn’t just resources. It’s the accumulated marginal gains across every aspect of operation, the organisational learning that only comes from racing, and occasionally, getting fundamentally lucky with technical regulation interpretation.

Audi Revolut F1 Team opens its new chapter in Melbourne this March. Whether that chapter becomes a success story or another expensive lesson in F1’s difficulty won’t be clear for years. That’s what makes it compelling to watch unfold.

Tracking Number Scam Lands in Ireland

0

Picture the scene. You’ve ordered a product from Amazon.ie. You feel conflicted, because you needed a new car charger, but you didn’t want to support Jeff Bezos. Then you realise that you’re never getting that car charger because you bought from an Amazon scam store.

This is my story. You can even add in a sprinkle of hypocrisy given that we earn from Amazon Affiliate links (you try running an honest media company these days).

But this is a far more common story than you might think. This is the unfortunately infamous tracking number scam which is now on Amazon.ie.

What is a tracking number scam?

When you purchase something online, you expect certain reassurances from the seller. One of the most important is your tracking number, that alphanumeric code from An Post, DHL, DPD, or whichever courier is handling your delivery. It lets you follow your purchase from dispatch to doorstep, providing accountability and peace of mind.

But what if that tracking number wasn’t actually linked to your purchase? What if it was hijacked from a completely different order, heading to your general area but for an entirely different customer?

This is the tracking number scam. It’s equal parts sophisticated and simple.

How a tracking scam actually works

The process is deceptively simple. Let’s say, like me, you’ve ordered an in-car phone charger from Amazon (or another marketplace to be fair). Here’s what happens:

  1. The scammer lists the item at an attractive price
  2. You purchase it and pay
  3. The scammer uploads a tracking number to the platform
  4. You check the tracking, it’s active, shows movement, looks completely legitimate
  5. Days later, the status updates to “Delivered”
  6. But nothing arrives at your address

When you open a dispute claiming non-delivery, the platform checks the tracking number. It shows “Delivered” to your city or postal area. From the platform’s perspective, the seller fulfilled their obligation. Your dispute gets denied, and the scammer keeps your money unless you can prove fraud, which requires significant effort and evidence.

Where are scammers getting tracking number from?

This is where the scam gets particularly troubling. Scammers aren’t creating fake tracking numbers, they’re using real ones from legitimate shipments. When this happened to me, there was a tracking number attached to the product I ordered on Amazon, coming from China to Ireland. I could take my DHL tracking number from Amazon, and check it in the DHL website.

There would have been red flags had I done that, but early days I had no reason to be suspicious. It was only when it was marked delivered and I didn’t have my car charger.

So where are these scammers getting the legit tracking codes from?

There are two primary methods:

Buying tracking numbers outright

There are dodgy websites that openly sell active tracking numbers. I just Googled it and found a plethora of websites offering the service. You select parameters like destination city, origin region, delivery status (in transit or delivered), and estimated delivery window.

This isn’t the “dark web”. I found this on my first Google search. Image: Marty Meany

The service then provides a tracking code corresponding to an actual parcel heading to that area. It’s disturbingly straightforward.

Harvesting tracking data

Third-party package tracking services aggregate shipment information across multiple couriers. These platforms often don’t treat tracking numbers as personal information. Some scammers exploit this by scraping vast quantities of real tracking data, building databases of usable codes they can match to victims by location.

But Amazon is safe?

Generally speaking, Amazon is a very safe place to shop. It’s also a great place to have shopped when something goes wrong because Amazon’s customer care tends to air on the side of the customers. The problem is that not everything you buy on Amazon.ie is from Amazon directly. I missed this when buying my car charger. I was buying from a 3rd party seller or marketplace vendor.

AIspace has a reem of negative reviews.

I do look for trust signals on Amazon. When checking out this charger product page, I ignored the review ratings because they’re usually inflated, instead seeing the UGREEN Store and telling myself – yup, UGREEN is legit, I’m happy.

What I missed was further right and that the seller wasn’t Amazon; it was AIspace. If I had looked just a little further I’d find a seller that quite obviously was never going to send me a charger.

I typically run a mile when these kind of reviews get seen

There was one other red flag that I’m annoyed I missed. If something is too good to be true, it probably is. I was a couple of filters deep when I bought the charger, so I don’t believe they were side by side when I bought them. But right now, they are. Why would the same product be so dramatically cheaper than another?

Well, the product on the left below, will actually get shipped to you by UGREEN UK. The product on the left will send you a delivered email for something completely different and that’s that. No charger for you.

99% of the time, too good to be true, is.

Can you get a refund?

The elegance of this scam, from a fraudster’s perspective, is that it exploits the very systems designed to protect buyers. Marketplaces rely on tracking information to adjudicate disputes. When a tracking number shows “Delivered” to the correct general area, automated systems flag it as legitimate. Even human reviewers often side with sellers when faced with valid tracking data.

The parcel genuinely existed. It genuinely got delivered. It just wasn’t your parcel.

Amazon, typically quite quick to solve customer problems like this when they’ve sold the product themselves, aren’t so quick to resolve issues with 3rd parties. They won’t leave you high and dry, but Amazon treads much more carefully here. To Amazon, you bought a product and got a product delivered to according to tracking.

However, if they look closer they’ll see that my one product was four, not delivered to my address at all.

Amazon will take 24 to 48 hours to resolve your problem, most likely without issue. But if they do, you still have the route of charge back with your bank, which again, if needed, should be successful.

Scammers are hoping that for €15 to €20, you might simply forget, not be bothered, or not know what to do.

How to avoid being scammed

Here I am again, after falling for a scam I shouldn’t have telling you how not to do the same thing. Sorry, I realise it’s silly, but I do hope I can help others.

When shopping on Amazon, only purchase products directly fulfilled by Amazon or by reputable 3rd party sources. Check the reviews – like I didn’t.

On the day of my “delivery” the biggest alarm bell for me was the fact I realised for the first time DHL was “delivering my package”. They usually send loads of emails and messages, but I had received nothing. I couldn’t access the “proof of delivery” on the tracking number, and the tracking number had a different address along with four, not one, products for delivery. Obviously, this wasn’t my tracking number at all.

Seeing the seller’s Amazon page was the obvious nail in the coffin.

Am I worried? Not really. These things happen. I’m angry that Amazon lets it happen, and doesn’t seem overly bothered that some people just won’t jump through hoops to get their refund sorted. If this happens to you, be sure you know your rights and how to pull some refund levers.

It’s also really important to note that this isn’t limited to Amazon. Marketplaces are growing in stature. These are online stores used by high traffic websites to let 3rd parties sell to customers. It’s the new wild west of ecommerce and getting wise to the pitfalls is crucial.

HAZET Bit Ratchet Screwdriver: Best Alternative to LTT Screwdriver

0

I love a good gadget and an impulse purchase. That’s why I paid a small fortune on the LTT precision screwdriver. I grabbed it despite there being big shipping costs and potential for customs, which I skirted.

But I couldn’t justify the primary LTT screwdriver the same way because there are some great alternatives much more readily available to shoppers here in the EU.

I picked up the HAZET Ratchet Screwdriver.

Why This Comparison Makes Sense

The LTT screwdriver succeeded because it addressed a genuine gap: tech enthusiasts wanted a quality ratcheting driver with smooth action, integrated bit storage, and a premium feel. HAZET’s 810R targets exactly the same priorities, but comes from a century-old German manufacturer with deep workshop credibility rather than a YouTube creator’s merch store.

The ratchet feel matters enormously when you’re doing repetitive assembly work. HAZET uses a free-running mechanism that’s notably silent and smooth, with minimal back drag when you reverse direction. You genuinely notice the difference during extended use. It’s the kind of quality that makes a screwdriver pleasant to use rather than merely functional.

Now, it does mean the screwdriver has one less element that sells the LTT screwdriver. The rachet isn’t satisfying. It’s oddly smooth leaving me sometimes wondering if anything is working. But it is – perfectly. Just silently

Traditional Tool Versatility

Unlike many modern ratcheting drivers locked into one mode, the 810R switches cleanly between ratchet directions and can function as a standard fixed screwdriver. When you need precise control for delicate work, that rigid mode becomes valuable. It’s a flexibility that workshop tools have retained whilst many consumer-focused alternatives simplified their designs.

The integrated bit storage uses a push-button magazine system that’s genuinely quick to access mid-task. I’ve used drivers where bit storage feels like an afterthought, fiddly caps or magazines that don’t stay secure. HAZET’s implementation works like it should: press, swap bit, continue working.

The compact variant measures 170mm closed versus the LTT’s 213mm. That difference sounds minor until you’re fitting tools into existing storage or working in constrained spaces. Shorter doesn’t mean less capable, it’s just optimised differently.

The Workshop Tool Philosophy

HAZET positions this as a comfortable, secure-grip driver designed for sustained use. The handle geometry favours effective torque application rather than aesthetic statements. If you regularly drive fasteners under load, that traditional ergonomic approach pays off. It feels like a tool first, which might sound obvious, but many modern drivers prioritise looks or brand identity over pure functional design.

There’s nothing wrong with the LTT screwdriver, it’s excellent at what it does. But HAZET offers the big advantage: it’s a worthy alternative with most of the LTT features but it’s European and readily available on Amazon with cheap to free shipping and little if any customs risk.

Final Assessment

The HAZET 810R succeeds by focusing entirely on being an exceptional ratcheting bit driver without secondary concerns. It delivers the smooth action, integrated storage, and quality feel that made the LTT driver popular, but from a traditional manufacturing perspective.

For builders, technicians, or anyone prioritising pure tool performance over brand attachment, it’s worth serious consideration. The compact form factor, gearless mechanism, and workshop-focused design make it genuinely competitive with consumer-facing alternatives. Sometimes the best choice is simply a well-executed professional tool doing exactly what it’s designed for.

Many are baffled that anyone would pay full whack for one of these screwdrivers. Sure, they are cool and buying one supports a channel that I enjoy. But this isn’t their primary wheelhouse. Which means other companies can make better tools for cheaper. Companies, like HAZET.

When Trade Wars Come to Your Shopping Basket: A Practical Guide

0

EU and Irish leaders have reached the moment where it’s time to grow massive spines. I’m not wise to most economic moves and the impacts, as I’m sure will appear abundantly clear in this article, but what’s right is right. Trump is now threatening to impose tariffs on the UK and EU countries as leverage unless Greenland is sold to the US.

To be clear about what’s actually happening: this is being reported as a negotiating tactic rather than imminent policy. Tariffs would likely apply to physical goods, not services. Timelines and scope can change quickly, and this could be political signalling rather than concrete trade policy. Still, the threat itself is worth taking seriously.

The EU needs to say: cool bruh, best of luck with that. Ireland needs to stop standing in the corner, afraid to move like that dinosaur from Jurassic Park with motion sensor eyes is in the same room. And we, the consumers, need to start paying attention to where our products come from. We should be trying to buy Irish, EU, or even (shudders) British products.

Understanding Tariffs Without the Economics Degree

A tariff is basically a tax on imported goods. It’s paid at the import level, but in reality it shows up in prices for consumers. Economically, it can raise costs even if you support the policy politically. The theory is that it protects domestic industries. The reality is that ordinary people usually end up paying more for everyday items, whilst politicians use them as bargaining chips.

If this escalates, the EU would likely respond with counter-tariffs. Trade wars rarely end with one measure. They tend to spiral, affecting ordinary consumers most whilst achieving questionable political outcomes.

Why Ireland’s Position Is Particularly Messy

Ireland’s situation is uniquely awkward. A huge chunk of Irish GDP is tied up in US multinationals based here. American firms dominate Irish exports, jobs, and tax receipts. We’ve built our economy around being an attractive base for US tech and pharmaceutical companies.

Here’s the problem: Ireland is also inside the EU’s trade bloc, so we don’t get to freestyle our response. We can’t negotiate separately or take an independent stance. When the EU responds to US tariffs, Ireland has to follow suit, even though it potentially hurts our economic model more than most other EU members. Hence, the standing very still in the corner, hoping nobody notices us.

The Reality Check: Not Everything Is Boycottable

Before we get into practicalities, let’s acknowledge something important: some US products are genuinely hard to avoid. The modern economy doesn’t divide neatly into national boxes anymore.

Focus on categories where consumers have real choice:

Easy switches: Fast food chains, soft drinks, snacks, shaving products, coffee pods, beer, breakfast cereals

Switch when convenient: Toothpaste, shampoo, clothes, trainers, cleaning products

Harder to replace: Cloud services, smartphones, operating systems (if even tarrifed)

Not realistic or potentially unsafe: Certain medicines, specialised medical devices, some software you depend on for work

This isn’t purity politics. Origin is messy. Don’t obsess over perfection. Aim for improvement where it’s actually feasible.

The Services Question: Netflix, Google, Meta, Amazon

Tariffs apply to physical goods, not services. Netflix won’t be affected. Neither will your Google Workspace subscription or Amazon Prime Video. This is important because it shows how modern trade leverage has shifted.

Europe has fewer physical exports to use as leverage against the US compared to its dependence on American tech platforms. Retaliation could shift towards US digital services through different mechanisms, regulatory measures, tax policies, or data localisation requirements. This is what a modern economy looks like: most value isn’t in shipping containers anymore.

Building a home server makes all of this surprisingly more achievable. You get to move away from Google Photos to Immich for example. No more Netflix, if you choose to sail the seven seas.

Shopping Triage: A Three-Tier Approach

Rather than telling you to figure it out yourself, here’s a practical framework:

Switch instantly (no real loss): Coca-Cola versus local brands, McDonald’s versus independent cafés, American snack brands versus European equivalents. These switches cost you nothing in convenience.

Switch when convenient: Next time you need toothpaste, shampoo, or trainers, check the alternatives. When your current bottle runs out or your shoes wear through, make a different choice. No need to bin what you already own.

Leave for now: Your phone, laptop, streaming subscriptions. These involve contracts, ecosystems, and genuine inconvenience. Tackle the easy stuff first.

The Barcode Trap

There are apps that scan barcodes and show country of origin. I’ve tried several. They’re mind-numbing to use thanks to ads, and I’ve yet to find one that works reliably. I might even try building one if needs be.

But here’s the complication: barcode prefixes often indicate where the barcode was issued, not manufacturing origin. “Made in EU” might still mean American company profits. “Made in Ireland” can still be an American-owned multinational plant.

This isn’t a reason to give up. It’s a reason to be realistic about what you’re actually achieving. You’re reducing American revenue, which matters. You’re not achieving perfect separation, which was never possible anyway.

The Contradiction I Need to Address

Earlier I said we should be trying to buy Irish or EU products, not US. That’s the actual stance. When I mentioned US in the original list, I meant Irish or EU made, including products manufactured in EU facilities even if the parent company is American-owned. Clarity matters here.

The goal is shifting where profits flow and where manufacturing happens. Complete decoupling isn’t realistic or probably even desirable long term. Strategic reduction is.

My Own Hypocrisy

I’ve dramatically reduced my McDonald’s intake from a few stops a month to just a handful of stops last year, usually because I was stuck and it’s all that was open whilst on the road. Whilst McDonald’s claims boycotts have no impact, they certainly do impact the bottom line. The company remains profitable but less so, and definitely feeling the pinch.

Yet I’m a hypocrite. There are countless American products I recommend in other contexts. My laptop is American. My phone’s operating system is American. Much of the software I depend on is American. I’m not pretending to be pure about this.

What I’m hoping is that we shift towards more Irish and EU-focused products where realistic alternatives exist. Not as a permanent boycott, but as a statement that Europe isn’t a bargain bin for American political leverage.

What Happens Next

Not everything can be solved by an app. Don’t be lazy and make an effort to find out where the products you buy come from. When you’re choosing between functionally identical products, pick the one that doesn’t fund the economy currently threatening yours.

This isn’t forever. This is us saying: you don’t get to treat Europe like a bargaining chip. We’ll go back to normal when the US starts acting normal. Until then, spend like your values matter.

At least for the next two years, until we give the US a chance to redeem itself. If we get that far.

The 2016 Trend: Why Everyone’s Posting Old Photos

Social media is currently awash with images from a decade ago. The format is simple: a photo from 2016, captioned with nothing more than the year itself. The implicit message behind these posts? “Let’s make 2026 be the next 2016.”

What’s Driving the Nostalgia

There are a few practical factors at play here. Snapchat, which was gathering serious momentum in 2016, recently announced it would start charging for memory storage. This has prompted many users to download their archives, leading to inevitable scrolling through galleries of years past. When you’re confronted with photos of yourself from a decade ago, complete with that ubiquitous dog filter, the temptation to share is understandable.

The timing feels somewhat curious though. 2016 wasn’t exactly a golden year by most measures. Personally, it was the year before my Dad died and the year he battled hardest against cancer. The image for this post reminded me about that. The day we found out he had cancer was during a period where I’d quit my smartphone for charity, using only a Nokia 5110. I still remember trying to find the hospital without Google Maps and people wondering why the hell I had an old phone.

Away from my personal life, tt was notable for an unusually high number of celebrity deaths, nearly weekly it seemed. David Bowie, Prince, Muhammad Ali, Alan Rickman, Gene Wilder, Leonard Cohen. The list went on. Trump was elected president for the first time (a phrase that still feels strange to write), and Brexit began its long journey from slogan to reality.

The Appeal of Looking Backwards

Despite the questionable merits of 2016 itself, I understand the impulse behind this trend. There’s something fundamentally human about retreating into nostalgia when the present feels overwhelming. We saw similar retro trends emerge during the pandemic, when the world felt particularly uncertain. When daily news cycles feel traumatic, which they increasingly do, our minds naturally gravitate towards memories of simpler, more innocent times, even if those times weren’t actually that simple or innocent in hindsight.

These posts represent a fairly harmless trip down memory lane. People sharing their past selves, perhaps younger, perhaps more carefree in appearance if not in reality. It’s social media at its most benign, really.

A Cynical Possibility

That said, there’s a more sceptical interpretation worth considering. Could this trend be a concealed effort to get users voluntarily sharing older photos that are otherwise locked away in private archives? Photos that could be used to train AI models on a wider range of images and faces across different time periods?

This might sound a bit tin foil hat, but it’s not remotely unrealistic. We’ve seen coordinated efforts to harvest user data through viral trends before. AI companies are desperate for training data, particularly images that show people across different ages and contexts. A viral trend that encourages mass uploading of decade-old photos would be remarkably convenient for such purposes.

I’m not claiming this is definitely what’s happening, but it’s naive to dismiss the possibility entirely given how valuable this data would be.

Looking Forward Instead

Regardless of the underlying motivations, that’s the essence of the 2016 trend. Personally, I’d rather focus energy on making the future better than either today’s news cycles or the problems of ten years ago. Nostalgia has its place, but it’s ultimately a backward-facing emotion. We can’t remake 2016, and honestly, we probably shouldn’t want to.

Kindle vs Kobo: Why I’m Backing the “Underdog”

0

I’ve owned both Kindles and Kobos over the years, and whilst Amazon’s offering remains the polished default choice, I keep coming back to Kobo despite their best efforts to make me regret it. There’s something about escaping Amazon’s walled garden that matters more than seamless shopping, even if it means accepting a slightly rougher experience.

Here’s where both actually stand in 2026, focusing particularly on the Paperwhite versus Kobo Clara Colour matchup.

For transparency, I daily the Kobo Clara Colour which I bought myself over a year ago.

The Kindle Case: Polished, Powerful, and Increasingly Annoying

What Kindle Does Better

Amazon built the Kindle ecosystem to be frictionless, and it genuinely is. If you’re already buying from Amazon (and realistically, most people are), the integration is seamless. One tap purchases, instant delivery to device, and a massive store that loads quickly. It simply works.

Battery life on the Paperwhite is genuinely impressive. We’re talking weeks of reading, not the optimistic “weeks” that actually means five days. My Kobo Clara Colour, by comparison, drops noticeably after a single book and somehow loses charge even when sitting idle. It’s not like you’ll need to carry a powerbank around with you, but there’s a marked difference.

Kindle Unlimited remains the stronger subscription service if you read mainstream titles quickly. The selection is broader, updates are constant, and popular books actually appear there. Kobo Plus feels narrower and less diverse by comparison.

The reading experience itself is more polished. Progress indicators are intuitive (page numbers, time left in chapter, time left in book, percentage) and easy to cycle through. Goodreads integration is seamless if you track reading habits or participate in challenges.

If you’re considering colour e-readers specifically, the Kindle Colorsoft displays colour more crisply than the Kobo Clara Colour, which looks slightly muted in comparison. Though the Colorsoft’s launch was plagued with yellow tint issues and replacement chaos, so that advantage comes with caveats.

Where Kindle Loses Me

The ecosystem lock-in has become increasingly aggressive. No native EPUB support means converting files or staying within Amazon’s store. When you “buy” a Kindle book, you’re essentially leasing it, and that distinction matters more than people think. Especially today where everything is locked behind subscription and owning has become increasingly difficult.

Library borrowing exists, but it’s clunky. You can use Libby, but you’re browsing on your phone or laptop, then sending books to your Kindle. It works, technically, but it’s not integrated into the device itself.

Then there are the lockscreen ads. Unless you pay extra to remove them, many Kindles ship with advertisements on the lockscreen. It’s a small thing that becomes genuinely irritating, leaving a Black Mirror style taste in your mouth, over time, particularly when Kobo just shows your current book cover by default.

Most frustratingly, Amazon keeps tightening restrictions on sideloading your own files. What used to be straightforward has become increasingly awkward, pushing you back toward their store. This isn’t about piracy; it’s about reading PDFs, work documents, or legitimately purchased books from other sources without jumping through hoops.

The Kobo Argument: Messy Freedom

What Makes Kobo Worth Considering

Kobo’s killer feature is proper library integration. OverDrive is built directly into the device. You can browse, borrow, and read library books without touching your phone. If you use public libraries regularly, this alone justifies choosing Kobo. Connect to multiple library systems and your borrowing power expands significantly beyond Amazon’s offering.

Format support is genuinely open. EPUB, PDF, multiple other formats, plus Dropbox integration for quick sideloading. This flexibility matters if you read widely across sources or maintain your own digital library outside corporate ecosystems.

The lockscreen experience feels more reader-focused. Your current book cover displays with progress indicators. No ads, no promotions, just your book waiting for you.

For graphic novels and comics, the colour on the Clara Colour adds genuine value. It’s not essential for text reading, but if you read illustrated content regularly, that splash of colour improves the experience noticeably.

The compact size of the Clara Colour makes it more portable and comfortable for extended reading sessions, though this comes down to personal preference.

Where Kobo Disappoints

Even acknowledging Kobo’s strengths, Kindle still wins on overall user experience polish. Small interface decisions, navigation flow, the general feel of using the device, Amazon simply invested more in refinement.

Battery performance can be a little weak. My Clara Colour dropped significantly after one book and loses charge when idle, which shouldn’t happen with e-ink displays. However, if you’ve never had an e-book reader before, chances are you’ll remain amazed by the battery versus a regular device.

The page numbering system feels inflated compared to Kindle’s more physical-book-like approach. This creates awkward moments in book clubs when your “page 247” doesn’t match anyone else’s. There are some settings to sort this on the device, but still.

The purchasing flow requires scanning a QR code on your phone rather than one-tap buying on device. It’s an unnecessary extra step that breaks the reading flow.

The Pocket Betrayal

Here’s what really stings: Kobo used to integrate with Pocket, meaning I could bookmark articles on my laptop or phone, and they’d sync to my Kobo for distraction-free reading. It was brilliant for long-form journalism and exactly the kind of feature that justified choosing Kobo despite its rougher edges.

Then Kobo shut it down mid-2025. No replacement, no alternative, just gone. It’s precisely the kind of decision that makes you question whether investing in their ecosystem is worthwhile when they’ll arbitrarily remove useful features.

My Honest Recommendation

For most people, Kindle remains the better all-rounder. The Paperwhite specifically offers the smoothest experience, the best battery, strongest ecosystem, and easiest buying flow.

But I keep choosing, and more importantly recommending, Kobo despite its limitations. The library integration alone saves me more than the device costs annually. The freedom to sideload any format without conversion, to own files properly rather than licensing them, and to avoid Amazon’s increasingly aggressive monetisation matters to me more than perfect polish.

The Clara Colour’s addition of colour is a small luxury, genuinely useful for comics and graphic novels, nice for book covers, and utterly unnecessary for straight text. But that little extra flair makes the device feel less utilitarian and slightly more enjoyable to pick up.

If you’re already deep in Amazon’s ecosystem, use Kindle Unlimited heavily, and rarely borrow library books, stick with Kindle. You’ll have a better experience day to day.

If you use libraries regularly, read across multiple sources, or simply prefer not feeding everything through Amazon, Kobo is the smarter choice even with its rougher edges. Just don’t get too attached to any particular feature, because they might remove it without warning.

The Pocket situation still annoys me, honestly. But I’m still using my Kobo.

Eufy SoloCam E30 Review: No-Nonsense Home Security That Actually Delivers

0

I’ve been running Eufy cameras at my mum’s house for a while now, primarily the older Cam 2C models. They’ve done their job reliably, but when a specific need arose, monitoring a garden blind spot, I decided to test whether the SoloCam E30’s pan and tilt functionality could handle it. Spoiler: it absolutely can.

What Problem This Solves

The garden setup presented a classic security camera challenge. We needed coverage across a wide area without installing multiple fixed cameras. The ideal solution was a single unit that could track movement from right to left, covering the blind spot comprehensively. The SoloCam E30’s 360-degree pan and tilt, combined with AI tracking, handles this perfectly. It follows movement smoothly rather than just capturing static frames, which makes a tangible difference when you’re actually reviewing footage.

Image Quality and AI Tracking

The 2K resolution is a noticeable step up from the older Cam 2C models. To be fair, the 2C cameras still do their job adequately for basic monitoring, but the E30’s clarity is superior when you need to identify details. The AI tracking genuinely works as advertised. It picks up movement and follows it reliably without constant manual adjustment.

Installation

Mounting was straightforward, though my situation required slight adaptation. I installed mine on an old lamppost, which meant using metal strips for secure attachment. Even with this modification, the process remained simple. If you’re mounting to standard timber or brick, it’s even more straightforward.

One genuinely clever design choice: the included solar panel mounts directly to the camera’s top. This keeps the installation clean without trailing cables or separate mounting points. However, the app provides no guidance on optimal solar panel positioning, which matters considerably in climates like Ireland’s where sunlight is precious. I used a free solar positioning app from the Play Store to determine the best angle, which worked fine but feels like an oversight from Eufy.

Solar Performance: The Long Game

Solar charging requires patience and realistic expectations. The critical first step is fully charging the camera before installation, skip this, and you’re setting yourself up for problems.

My experience with solar on the older Cam 2C models has been positive overall, though the recent cold snap and shorter winter days did necessitate one manual recharge. The SoloCam E30 appears to be holding up similarly in early testing, but this is genuinely something that needs months of real-world use to assess properly. Winter performance is the true test for any solar-powered outdoor device.

The No-Subscription Advantage

Eufy deserves credit for bucking the subscription trend. Most camera manufacturers now push monthly fees for basic functionality. Eufy offers cloud storage subscriptions, certainly, but they remain genuinely optional rather than thinly disguised requirements.

The SoloCam E30 takes this further with integrated microSD storage. Pop in a microSD card and recordings save locally. This does introduce a security consideration, if someone physically removes the camera, they’ve got your footage, but that scenario suggests broader security issues anyway. For peace-of-mind monitoring rather than high-security applications, local storage works brilliantly.

Base-Free Operation: Accidental Redundancy

The SoloCam E30 connects directly to Wi-Fi without requiring a base station. This became unexpectedly valuable when we discovered our older cameras occasionally went offline because someone had unplugged the indoor base. As my sister pointed out, we’d accidentally built redundancy into the system, the E30 keeps working regardless of what happens indoors.

The camera does support certain Eufy base stations for additional features if you want them, but it’s completely functional standalone.

Value Assessment

At full retail price of €150, the Eufy SoloCam E30 delivers 360° pan and tilt tracking, 2K video quality, and solar charging without monthly fees. Real-world testing shows strong AI tracking, straightforward installation, and reliable performance for under €80 on sale.it’s competitive for the feature set. If you spot it reduced, it becomes a particularly compelling option for home security needs.

The combination of pan-and-tilt functionality, solid image quality, AI tracking, solar charging, local storage, and no subscription requirements makes this one of the stronger options in the mid-range security camera market. It’s not perfect, the solar setup could use better app integration, but the core functionality delivers exactly what it promises.

Better still, Eufy seems to use this as a “hook” product from time to time, meaning it can be got reduced. Worth keeping an eye!

Why Buy a Dehumidifier? 10 Signs You Need One

0

Your home environment directly affects how you feel day to day. I’ve noticed this particularly with humidity, something I didn’t think much about until excessive moisture started causing visible problems in my own living space in an old apartment. A decent dehumidifier sorted most of these issues within weeks and in my new home ensured they never happened again. But knowing when you actually need one isn’t always obvious.

Here are ten signs that indicate it’s time to invest in a dehumidifier, ordered by priority and practicality.

1. Visible Mould Growth

This is the most serious indicator. If you’re seeing patches of mould or mildew on walls, ceilings, or in corners, your humidity levels are definitely too high. This is a shockingly common issue in Ireland.

Irish homes face a perfect storm of conditions that make them particularly vulnerable to mould. The climate is persistently damp rather than dramatically wet, constant moisture in the air year-round without the temperature extremes that might dry things out. Combine this with older housing designs that often lacks adequate ventilation (many homes were built before modern building regulations around airflow) and the shift towards keeping homes sealed tight for energy efficiency, and you’ve got an environment where moisture has nowhere to go.

Modern double glazing and insulation improvements, whilst excellent for heating bills, can actually trap humidity inside if ventilation hasn’t been upgraded accordingly. It’s why you’ll see mould issues in both older period properties and newer builds that haven’t properly addressed moisture management.

Mould isn’t just unsightly; it poses genuine health risks, particularly for anyone with respiratory conditions. Once it’s established, mould spreads quickly and becomes increasingly difficult to remove. A dehumidifier won’t eliminate existing mould, but it will prevent new growth by maintaining moisture levels that make your home inhospitable to spores.

2. Heavy Tumble Dryer Usage

If you’re running a tumble dryer constantly, especially during winter, a dehumidifier offers a far more efficient alternative. I’ve got a Meaco unit with a dedicated laundry setting, and it’s genuinely transformed how I dry clothes. Rather than heating and tumbling fabric for hours, you can hang washing on a clothes horse in a room with the dehumidifier running. It extracts moisture directly from the air, speeding up drying time considerably whilst using a fraction of the energy.

Modern new builds are increasingly incorporating dedicated drying rooms with built-in dehumidifier units, but you can achieve the same result retrospectively with a portable unit. The key feature to look for is a laundry mode that keeps the device running regardless of ambient humidity, ensuring it doesn’t stop mid-cycle when moisture levels temporarily drop.

3. Condensation on Windows

Waking up to fogged windows with water running down the glass is a clear humidity indicator. This isn’t just an aesthetic issue; persistent condensation damages windowsills and frames, eventually leading to rot in wooden surrounds or corrosion in metal ones. A dehumidifier tackles the root cause by reducing airborne moisture, preventing condensation from forming in the first place.

4. Persistent Musty Odours

That lingering damp smell that cleaning never quite shifts? It’s typically caused by mould and mildew thriving in high humidity conditions. You might not see visible growth yet, but the spores are there, multiplying in hidden spaces like behind furniture or inside cupboards. By extracting excess moisture, a dehumidifier eliminates the conditions these organisms need to survive, which sorts the smell problem at its source rather than just masking it.

5. Worsening Allergy Symptoms

If you or family members experience sneezing, itching, or respiratory discomfort that intensifies indoors, humidity might be the culprit. High moisture levels create ideal breeding grounds for dust mites and allow mould spores to proliferate. I’ve found that maintaining humidity between 40-60% makes a noticeable difference to indoor air quality, particularly during seasons when you can’t ventilate properly by opening windows.

6. Peeling Wallpaper or Paint

When wallpaper starts lifting at the seams or paint begins bubbling and cracking, excess moisture is working its way through your walls. This water damage ruins your decor, but more concerning is what it indicates about conditions inside the wall cavity itself, where mould can establish undetected. Stabilising humidity levels prevents further deterioration and protects your investment in decorating.

7. Warped or Damaged Wood

Wooden furniture, flooring, and fixtures absorb moisture from humid air, causing them to swell, warp, or bow. I’ve seen solid wood doors become difficult to close and hardwood floors develop gaps as humidity fluctuates seasonally. Quality wooden items represent a significant investment; maintaining optimal moisture levels protects them from permanent damage.

8. Stuffy, Heavy Air

Even when temperatures are mild, excessively humid air feels thick and uncomfortable to breathe. You might notice this particularly in bedrooms overnight or in rooms with poor ventilation. It’s not just discomfort; that heavy feeling indicates air quality that’s genuinely harder on your respiratory system. A dehumidifier improves overall freshness and makes indoor spaces feel cleaner and more breathable.

9. Unexplained Energy Bill Increases

If your heating or cooling costs have crept up without corresponding changes in usage, your HVAC system might be working overtime to compensate for high humidity. Humid air feels warmer than it actually is, causing you to lower temperatures further, whilst the system itself struggles to regulate conditions effectively. Reducing moisture lightens this load, potentially delivering noticeable savings on energy bills.

10. General Discomfort

Ultimately, trust your instincts. If your home consistently feels uncomfortable—whether that’s difficulty sleeping, feeling perpetually sticky, or just sensing something’s off with the air quality—excess humidity is likely contributing. You spend significant time in your living space; it should feel pleasant. A dehumidifier creates a more comfortable environment for everyone, addressing problems you might not even have consciously identified yet.

When choosing a unit, capacity matters. The Meaco 12L model I mentioned handles most homes effectively. Consider where you’ll primarily use it and whether you need that laundry function, which genuinely justifies the investment if you’re currently relying on tumble dryers.

JBL Flip 7 Review: A Reliable Choice

0

I’ve been using the JBL Flip 7 for a very long time, and it’s easy to see why JBL consistently dominates the Bluetooth speaker market. This isn’t about flashy features or gimmicks; it’s about getting the fundamentals right and delivering genuine value.

What Actually Matters: Sound and Battery

The sound quality punches well above what you’d expect from something this compact. There’s proper depth here, not just mid-range mush. The highs come through clearly without harshness, and the low frequencies render surprisingly well for a speaker this size. One user captured it perfectly: “I really love the sound depth of this portable speaker. Very portable with very good dynamic range. Loud on the highs and clearly rendering the low frequencies.” That matches my experience entirely.

Battery life is exceptional. This matters more than people initially think. When you’re actually using a portable speaker regularly, charging becomes an annoyance. The Flip 7 lasts long enough that I genuinely forget about battery anxiety, which is exactly how portable audio should work.

Practical Design Choices

The clip-on feature is more useful than it sounds on paper. Being able to secure it to a bag means I’m not constantly worrying about it rolling around or getting damaged during transport. One motorcyclist mentioned it fits inside their jacket without becoming cumbersome, which speaks to how well JBL thought through the physical dimensions.

The vibrant colour options aren’t just aesthetic. When you’re using something outdoors regularly, being able to spot it easily actually matters. Mine stands out enough that I’ve never lost track of it, even in cluttered environments.

The App Advantage

The JBL Portable app provides proper EQ controls with a wide range of frequencies to adjust. This elevates the Flip 7 beyond “what you hear is what you get” territory. If you prefer more bass for certain genres or want to dial back treble for spoken content, you can. Not everyone will use this feature, but having the option demonstrates JBL’s understanding of different listening preferences.

Real-World Durability

The build quality inspires confidence. It’s clearly designed to handle being thrown in bags, taken on trips, and used outdoors without babying it. One user mentioned it’s “saving their mental health on an extended multi-month trip around the globe,” which suggests it holds up under genuine travel conditions, not just weekend camping trips.

Who This Suits

The Flip 7 works best for people who want reliable, quality audio without complexity. If you’re bouncing between different locations, travelling regularly, or just want something that sounds good without requiring a manual, this delivers. The portability means it fits into actual daily life rather than becoming another device you need to plan around.

Honest Limitations

This isn’t an audiophile device. If you’re critically listening to high-resolution audio in controlled environments, you’ll want something more specialised. The bass, whilst impressive for the size, has physical limits. And whilst the app helps, you’re still working within the constraints of a compact Bluetooth speaker.

Final Assessment

The JBL Flip 7 succeeds because it prioritises what actually matters in daily use: sound quality, battery life, durability, and genuine portability. It’s not trying to revolutionise anything; it’s executing the fundamentals exceptionally well. For most people looking for a Bluetooth speaker they’ll actually use regularly, that’s exactly what they need.